- June 10, 2025
As Australia and South Africa clash in the ICC World Test Championship Final 2025 at Lord’s on June 11, the spotlight falls on two masters of spin—Nathan Lyon and Keshav Maharaj. With similar records at the 57-Test mark, the question isn’t just who has more wickets, but who’s been more effective when it really matters.
The Wicket Column: Margins Matter
Let’s discuss the big, fat number – wickets. After 57 Tests, Nathan Lyon had 211 wickets. Maharaj had 198. That is a distance of 13 wickets – just enough to say Lyon (got a toehold) with wicket-taking slightly sooner. The biggest (part) part, is that while Lyon burst onto the Test scene in 2011 2011, Maharaj didn’t debut until 2016, but quickly became a way of making up for what he had achieved!
Lyon has benefited from more innings to bowl in matches because Australia is more prone to playing long test matches and has indeed often had better batting units. Maharaj, at times, walks into a game that is already crumbling and must produce miracles. So, for this round, Lyon has the edge, but Maharaj’s numbers must still be respected, particularly in the context in which he has gotten those numbers.
The Battle of Efficiency: Average, Strike Rate & Economy
If you’re a fan of efficient bowling, then Maharaj sneaks ahead here. After 57 Tests, Maharaj’s bowling average was 29.68, compared to Lyon’s 32.80. What does this mean? Maharaj gives up fewer runs per wicket. To top that off, for every 57 balls bowled, Maharaj takes a wicket with a strike rate of 57.3 balls per wicket, while Lyon’s strike rate was 62.38 balls per wicket. That is a full over difference per wicket!
And the economy? Pretty much the same. Lyon had 3.15 and Maharaj had 3.10. Not exactly a separator, but it helps with the story that Maharaj was more economical. Lyon’s best match figures were 12, 286 (average of 23.83), whereas Maharaj’s were 12, 283 (average of 23.58), so Maharaj is not far behind in what we might term match-winning performances. So, Lyon is the workhorse. Maharaj might just be the more surgical operator.
Winning Games and Home Comforts
Now let’s look at the impact. What good are those wickets if they are not being converted into wins? Well, both spinners know how to contribute when it matters. Lyon took 119 wickets in winning causes from his first 57 Tests, while Maharaj was just a whisker behind on 116. There is one curveball – South Africa has won a total of 33 matches with Maharaj in the XI, which is slightly more than Australia’s 30 wins with Lyon. This is quite revealing in terms of Maharaj’s impact on being the catalyst for a match-winning moment.
Then there is also the home and away question. Lyon’s data was surprisingly symmetrical—104 wickets at home, and 107 away. Maharaj was much more away-wicket focused, collecting 86 wickets at home and 112 wickets away. This suggests both players have made their contributions on an opponent’s home turf, but Lyon is somewhat more consistent, especially at home.
Who is the best spinner at this stage of their respective careers? If going off simply wickets, Lyon is the best. If going on pure efficiency, then Maharaj is ahead. Both bowlers provide different attributes, but both are invaluable to their middle orders.
The best part about this comparison is that it does not choose one as the clear winner, as cricket and spin bowling are always about the grey areas. So, the question is which spinner delivers in the big moment – Lyon’s reliable or Maharaj’s efficient? Let the games begin.
For more, visit JeetBuzz News to read our quality Cricket Blog updates. Explore if you want to reminisce and enjoy all of your favourite cricket players and nostalgic match moments. To ensure that you never miss out, keep updated and join in the fun!
