It wasn’t supposed to be this way. Dhruv Jurel was meant to be Rishabh Pant’s understudy, reliable, versatile, but ultimately replaceable. Yet, with one century and a string of mature innings, Jurel has quietly thrown a curveball at India’s Test hierarchy. The question now isn’t whether he deserves a place; it’s whether he should be walking out before Virat Kohli once Pant returns.
India’s No.3 slot, once a fortress guarded by Dravid, then Pujara, has lately turned into a revolving door. Sai Sudharsan was the latest to try and seal it after selectors promised him a fair run. But one shaky outing against the West Indies, paired with Jurel’s fluent hundred in Ahmedabad, reopened the debate.
A Backup Who Batted His Way Up: The New-Ball Familiarity
For a keeper-batter who was supposed to live in the middle order, Jurel’s comfort with the new ball is striking. In the 2022–23 Ranji season, he opened for Uttar Pradesh, smashing 429 runs at an average of 71.5, including a monumental 249. That’s not just volume; that’s intent.
Those innings taught him to handle swing, seam, and mental fatigue, all hallmarks of top-order survival. India’s recent No.3s, from Gill’s uncertain transition to Sudharsan’s tentative strokeplay, have struggled to balance aggression with control. Jurel, by contrast, has shown that he can play time and tempo, the hallmark of a modern No.3 who knows when to absorb and when to attack.
Psychological Edge: The Keeper’s Grit
There is something about keepers and mental steel. A keeper spends 150 overs behind the wickets and learns patience, pattern recognition, and calm. All these qualities spill over into batting. Jurel conveys those instincts. His innings against England in Ranchi wasn’t an innings; it was a demonstration of cricketing character. He read the spinners like an open book, countered the pressure with calmness, and defence was suddenly converted into aggression when the bowler faltered.
In comparison to Sudharsan, who is still batting as if he is not sure how to accelerate or to anchor himself in the innings and looks like he is batting on borrowed time, Jurel looks assured already, not based on promise but based on experience, and looks like the one who belongs.
Data Speaks: The Shape of a No.3
In all formats and across levels, Jurel’s red-ball record reads like that of a player who is steadily moving up a steep curve: a first-class average that is nearly 50, a strike rate in the pleasant 60s, and hundreds made in adverse as well as in placid conditions of the most gripping nature for a batter. He is not an exuberant dasher in disguise; he is an artist who moves with agility and yet does not lose a sense of shape.
Contrast that with Sudharsan’s early Test numbers, low 20s average, strike rate below 50, and visible discomfort when bowlers change angles or pace. India’s search for a modern, adaptable No.3, someone who can counterattack like Labuschagne but think like Dravid, suddenly has a surprising new name on the shortlist.
Expert Insight: History Favors the Brave No.3
Dravid was not moved to No.3 in 1999, because he was the most flamboyant, but because he was the most dependable. The same logic forced India to trust Pujara to hold fort through the 2010s. The functions have, however, changed since. The No.3 has now to don many hats: anchor, aggressor, and tone-setter.
In that sense, Jurel feels closer to the modern hybrid template, think Travis Head for Australia or Joe Root during his 2018 purple patch. They’re proactive, not passive. They dominate rather than survive.
Key Takeaway: Dhruv Jurel’s rise isn’t just a form; it’s proof that India’s next No.3 might already be in the XI.
FAQs
1. Why should Dhruv Jurel bat at No.3 for India?
His technique, temperament, and prior top-order experience make him better equipped to face the new ball than current contenders.
2. What makes Jurel different from Sai Sudharsan?
Jurel plays with clarity and adaptability, while Sudharsan’s tentative starts have made him look uncertain at the crucial No.3 slot.
3. Can Jurel and Pant play together in Tests?
Absolutely. Jurel’s batting form allows India to field both Pant as a keeper-batter and Jurel as a specialist top-order anchor.
Disclaimer: This blog post reflects the author’s personal insights and analysis. Readers are encouraged to consider the perspectives shared and draw their own conclusions.
Step into the world of cricket with JeetBuzz News—where expert opinions, trending Blogs, and behind-the-scenes insights meet all your favorite topics. Stay informed, stay entertained, and never miss the stories shaping the cricketing world—only on JeetBuzz News!
