There’s a peculiar irony to Australia’s Ashes campaign this summer: the man who hasn’t bowled a competitive ball in nearly five months feels fresher than the one who hasn’t stopped bowling for two. Pat Cummins is poised to reclaim the captain’s blazer in Adelaide, while Josh Hazlewood, forever Australia’s reliability index, has been ruled out of the entire series after a double setback involving a hamstring strain and a late Achilles flare-up.
For a team that entered the series with a meticulous fast-bowling roadmap, losing Josh Hazlewood is not just a personnel blow; it collapses a tactical pillar. His economy, his seam control, his ability to bowl long spells while Starc attacks Australia have built entire five-Test blueprints around that rhythm.
Hazlewood’s Absence Reshapes Australia’s Stability Model
Hazlewood’s role in Ashes cricket is practically architectural: build pressure until someone collapses. His injury pattern, hamstring in the Shield, Achilles setback last week, means his whole summer is wiped out. And that matters.
The Starc–Hazlewood–Cummins equilibrium was designed to stretch England’s ‘Bazball’ tempo. Hazlewood denies easy singles, Cummins hits the splice, and Starc hunts wickets. Remove the pressure valve, and Australia’s attack becomes more volatile by default. McDonald’s quiet frustration, “Really flat for him,” captures the emotional side, but tactically, this is a crack in the foundation.
Cummins’ High-Load Return and the Risk-Reward Equation
Cummins has simulated match intensity at Allan Border Field, bowling multiple spells alone while Brisbane prepared for the Test. That tells you Australia is confident in his body—but also how cautious they’ve become about reintroducing him.
Five months without cricket is unusual for a fast-bowling captain. Yet history shows Cummins often returns from layoffs sharper than expected. Even so, Adelaide’s day-night conditions ask for ruthlessness in control, and if Cummins’ rhythm wobbles early, Australia may struggle to find the perfect tempo between attack and containment.
Starc’s Workload and the Coming Fatigue Bottleneck
Mitchell Starc’s numbers 62.5 overs in two Tests illustrate both his brilliance and his burden. A “left side niggle” isn’t alarming yet, but these are precisely the signs the support staff dread when three Tests are separated by thin four-day breaks.
Starc thrives when used in short, violent bursts; recent workloads have made him the metronome instead of the disruptor. With Boland also pushing a heavy meter, Australia must now decide: rotate aggressively and risk losing momentum, or push the incumbents and risk late-series burnout?
The Selection Dominoes Behind the Scenes
With Cummins returning, at least two among Boland, Neser, and Doggett will miss Adelaide. It’s a ruthless decision, but necessary. Jhye Richardson’s 26-over outing for Australia A keeps him in the frame as a late-series wildcard, especially if Starc’s niggle evolves.
And don’t overlook Nathan Lyon, expected to return for the final three Tests. His presence could ease the pace unit’s burden, but only if Australia manages workloads well enough to keep a functioning attack around him.
A Familiar Australian Balancing Act Returns
Historically, Australia excel when their pace trio stays intact, think 2019 Ashes or the 2021-22 home dominance. But when the rotation carousel spins too early, instability creeps in. The 2015 Ashes, for instance, saw frequent changes, and rhythm evaporated along with the urn.
Today’s scenario feels similar: one key injury, one returning captain, one overworked enforcer. Yet Australia’s depth is richer in 2025, and its management sharper. If they handle the next two Tests like a chessboard rather than a treadmill, they can maintain dominance without Hazlewood’s metronomic reliability.
In essence, the Ashes will now test Australia’s planning discipline as much as their skill. Win that battle, and Hazlewood’s heartbreak won’t derail the urn defence.
Key Takeaway
Australia’s Ashes threat isn’t weakened; it just needs sharper management without Hazlewood’s control.
FAQs
- What impact does Hazlewood’s absence have on Australia?
It removes their key pressure-builder, forcing a more rotation-heavy pace strategy.
- Why is Cummins returning without match practice?
Australia carefully simulated match intensity for him, trusting his proven history of strong returns.
- How will Australia manage Starc’s growing workload?
Through selective rotation and possibly introducing Richardson or Neser in later Tests.
Disclaimer: This blog post reflects the author’s personal insights and analysis. Readers are encouraged to consider the perspectives shared and draw their own conclusions.
Step into the world of cricket with JeetBuzz News—where expert opinions, trending Blogs, and behind-the-scenes insights meet all your favorite topics. Stay informed, stay entertained, and never miss the stories shaping the cricketing world—only on JeetBuzz News!
