Suryakumar Yadav has clearly outperformed Glenn Maxwell at No. 4 in the WC, both in consistency and match-winning impact. A direct comparison of Suryakumar Yadav vs Glenn Maxwell No. 4 stats shows SKY holding a higher average, more 50-plus scores, and stronger returns in winning causes. While Maxwell remains explosive, Suryakumar Yadav’s record underlines why he is currently the more reliable middle-order force. This analysis breaks down runs, strike rate, conditions, and tactical influence to determine the best No. 4 batter on the T20 World Cup stage.
Run Volume and Consistency in T20WC
Suryakumar Yadav’s strong performances batting at No.4 in ODIs cannot be overlooked. He has played 16 matches and accumulated 532 runs with an average of 48.36 in comparison to Glenn Maxwell’s 354 runs (average of 29.50) across 17 matches. Not only does this constitute quite a significant margin of difference, but it also illustrates Suryakumar’s level of performance over a prolonged period of time against multiple different types of teams and numerous tournament formats. Conversely, Maxwell’s overall returns are generally episodic, with many occurring only within single high-profile games of play, while Suryakumar has had a relatively even distribution of career runs against both ICC Full Member nations as well as their Associate-level counterparts.
Strike Rate Under Match Conditions
The pure strike rate does not provide a complete picture. Suryakumar Yadav’s strike rate at No. 4 of 164.19 is achieved in part during periods of recovery, not only periods of acceleration. He has a 132.60 strike rate against England and 144.44 against Pakistan, demonstrating an ability to adjust to high-quality bowling units. Glenn Maxwell’s strike rate of 161.64 is increased by some very high scores, including strike rates above 200 against Bangladesh and the West Indies, but his numbers fall significantly against good bowling units, demonstrating that there is volatility in his batting at No. 4.
Impact on Winning Matches
The clearest separator is performance in wins. In matches India won, Suryakumar Yadav averaged 54.87 with a strike rate of 165.03, contributing five half-centuries. This shows a direct alignment between his innings and the team’s success. In contrast, Glenn Maxwell has averaged 20.33 in wins, with both of his half-centuries coming in defeats. From a tactical lens, this suggests Maxwell’s best innings often arrive when Australia are already under scoreboard pressure, rather than shaping winning trajectories.
Pressure Handling at No. 4
Oftentimes, batting in at four means stepping up in difficult situations where your team is struggling. This is the area of the game where Suryakumar has shown the ability to excel – having scored 84* against the USA with India at 77-6; thus requiring risk management accompanied by aggression. For Glenn Maxwell, when he has the ability to freely attack, he will score; however, if there are early wickets to force him into stabilization mode, his productivity will diminish as a result. This difference in approach is the reason SKY’s best No. 4 batter example has to do with having control rather than just shot-making ability.
Middle-Order Evolution in T20 World Cups
Although Glenn Maxwell is one of the most powerful hitters on the planet, his accomplishments as the Number 4 batsman during T20 World Cup matches are inconsistent and sometimes out of touch with how much he actually affects the outcome of a match. By making better personnel decisions relating to the fourth position of a T20 squad that balances stability versus momentum, teams will be able to continue using Suryakumar Yadav as the litmus test for finding potential four-hole players.
Key Takeaway
Suryakumar Yadav’s consistency, pressure control, and impact in wins make him the clear No. 4 benchmark over Glenn Maxwell.
FAQs
What is Suryakumar Yadav’s No 4 T20WC record?
He has scored over 500 runs at No. 4 with an average above 48, including six 50-plus scores.
Why are Glenn Maxwell’s No. 4 stats weaker in wins?
Most of his high scores have come in defeats, while his output drops in matches Australia wins.
How important is strike rate at No. 4 in?
Strike rate matters, but adaptability under pressure is equally critical for match impact.
Which batter is considered the best No 4 batter statistically?
Based on average, consistency, and wins impact, Suryakumar Yadav leads the comparison.
Can Glenn Maxwell still succeed at No. 4 in future tournaments?
Yes, but his effectiveness improves when he bats with scoreboard freedom rather than during recoveries.
